Contemporary
China has established a blistering pace of economic development that
has vaulted it past Japan to become the world's second largest economy.
Some analysts project that it will surpass the U.S. as the world's
largest economy within a generation. But all rapid change leaves a path of destruction and distress and China's success
has left in its wake uneasiness and stress, which has been memorably
articulated by award-winning author and commentator Yu Hua. Any
comparison of China's current situation with any part of America's
history is, of course, problematic and flawed, and the differences
outweigh the similarities. However, in some respects, China's current
stress faintly reflects the angst and dissatisfaction that resonated
through American society in the late 1800s, the so-called Gilded Age, a
period of unmatched economic achievement in America during which it
vaulted past Britain to become the world's largest economy:
"In
the thirty-odd years since Mao's death China has fashioned an
astonishing economic miracle, but the price it has paid is even more
astounding. When I left South Africa at the end of a visit during the
2010 World Cup, the duty-free shop at Johannesburg's airport was selling
vuvuzelas -- Chinese-made plastic horns -- for the equivalent of 100
yuan each, but on my return home I learned that the export price was
only 2.6 yuan apiece. One company in Zhejiang manufactured 20 million
vuvuzelas but ended up making a profit of only about 100,000 yuan.
"This example gives a sense
of China's lopsided development: year after year chemical plants will
dump industrial waste into our rivers, and although a single plant might
succeed in generating a thirty-million-yuan boost to China's GDP, to
clean up the rivers it has ruined will cost ten times that amount. An
authority I respect has put it this way: China's model of growth is to
spend 100 yuan to gain 10 yuan in increased GDP. Environmental
degradation, moral collapse, the polarization of rich and poor,
pervasive corruption -- all these things are constantly exacerbating the
contradictions in Chinese society. More and more we hear of mass
protests in which hundreds or even thousands of people will burst into a
government compound, smashing up cars and setting fire to buildings.
"Many Chinese have begun to
pine for the era of Mao Zedong, but I think the majority of them don't
really want to go back in time and probably just feel nostalgic.
Although life in the Mao era was impoverished and restrictive, there was
no widespread, cruel competition to survive, just empty class struggle,
for actually there were no classes to speak of in those days and so
struggle mostly took the form of sloganeering and not much else. People
then were on an equal level, all alike in their frugal lifestyles; as
long as you didn't stick your neck out, you could get through life quite
uneventfully.
"China today is a completely
different story. So intense is the competition and so unbearable the
pressure that, for many Chinese, survival is like war itself. In this
social environment the strong prey on the weak, people enrich
themselves through brute force and deception, and the meek and humble
suffer while the bold and unscrupulous flourish. Changes in moral
outlook and the reallocation of wealth have created a two-tiered
society, and this in turn generates social tensions. So in China today
there have emerged real classes and real class conflict.
"After Mao, Deng Xiaoping
drew on his own personal prestige to implement reforms and pursue an
open-door policy, but in his final years he came to reflect on the
paradox that even more problems had emerged after development than
existed before it. Perhaps this is precisely why Mao keeps being brought
back to life. Not long ago a public opinion poll asked people to
anticipate their reaction if Mao were to wake up today. Ten percent
thought it would be a bad thing, 5 percent thought it would have no
impact on China or the world, and 85 percent thought it would be a good
thing. I am unclear about the sample's demographics, but since the
respondents were all Internet users, I suspect they were mostly young
people. Chinese youth today know very little about Mao Zedong, so their
embracing the idea of Mao's resurrection tells us something about the
mood of the age. Gripped by the zeitgeist, people of diverse
backgrounds and disparate opinions find a common channel for their
discontent and -- half in earnest, half in jest -- act out a ritual of
restoring the dead to life."
Author: Yu Hua
Title: China in Ten Words
Publisher: First Anchor Books
Date: Copyright 2011 by Yu Hua
Pages: 24-26
Title: China in Ten Words
Publisher: First Anchor Books
Date: Copyright 2011 by Yu Hua
Pages: 24-26
No comments:
Post a Comment