Tuesday, September 30, 2014

INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO EBOLA WANTING


The deadliest outbreak of Ebola virus on record is causing havoc in five African countries namely Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Nigeria. In March 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported a major Ebola outbreak in Guinea. The highly infectious disease has since spread to catastrophic levels and taken an International dimension. WHO has declared the epidemic to be an international public health emergency but the international community has been slow to react and seemed indifferent to the plight of the affected countries.

According to the WHO, the countries affected to date simply do not have the capacity to manage an outbreak of this magnitude and complexity on their own. Apart from the human cost, the outbreak has severely battered the economies of the affected countries. Initially, many countries dealt with the fear of infectivity by isolating themselves from West Africa, closing their borders, canceling airline services and pulling ships back from West African ports. This has only worsened the situation leading to economic and social unrest.

The complexity of the situation and the danger that the disease poses to global health has led the WHO to urge for “drastic action” to contain Ebola. The slow response from the International community, especially the developed countries has allowed the epidemic to spread sparking fears that the killer virus could spread from West Africa to other regions and continents. It has been acknowledged that Ebola is just a plane ride away and therefore, no country is completely safe. Patrick Sawyer, a naturalized American citizen who worked in Liberia, flew to Nigeria intending to attend a conference. After exhibiting symptoms upon arrival July 20, he was hospitalized and died on July 25.Two other U.S. aid workers in Liberia have contracted Ebola and have been treated.

The United Nations has said that controlling the epidemic will require the world to increase its efforts twentyfold and to spend $1 billion in the next six months. Tim Shenk, a spokesman for the humanitarian group Doctors without Borders, emphasized that the actions of the U.S. government will determine whether the growing epidemic can be contained.  As the largest economy in the world, it was expected that the U.S would play a leading role and lead international response to the Ebola outbreak. However, it is China that has appeared proactive and quick to act.

China, the second largest economy responded to the epidemic with unprecedented generosity The Chinese president was the first to send condolences to the heads of state of the affected countries. Additionally, China dispatched three teams of infectious disease experts to assist local medical professionals and sent $5 million worth of medical supplies to the three most affected countries (Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea). President Xi Jinping announced that China would provide an additional $32 million worth of humanitarian aid to boost  already existing efforts to combat the epidemic. And last week, a 59-member Chinese laboratory team departed for Sierra Leone to help the country improve lab testing capacity, joining the 115 Chinese medical staff that are already on the ground. 

As the world’s second-largest economy, China has taken the burden of responding to the Ebola crisis and has showed concern and commitment not seen from any other country on the globe. Over the past month, China has contributed food, medical supplies and cash to help African countries and aid organizations combat the disease. China has also pledged to donate $2 million to the WHO and $2 million to the African Union to aid their Ebola response efforts. But it is still a developing nation, with poorer per capita than the United States, Japan or European Union countries. The WHO has described China’s new commitment as “a huge boost, morally and operationally.”

Therefore, the Chinese role in helping African countries fight Ebola should not be downplayed.  China was dispatching more health personnel as aid groups from the United States, Europe, and Japan were evacuating their own in droves. Despite their lack of experience in handling Ebola cases, Chinese doctors and volunteers seem eager to offer assiatance regarding the disease. For Africa, this is the time when we need our friends and neighbors. An African proverb states that “When your neighbour’s house catches fire, you don’t wait for it to spread to your house for you to act, but quickly join in containing the fire.

To other African countries, our neighbour’s house is on fire and we cannot sit and wait for China and the developed world to act as we sit and watch. Many countries in Africa are still at risk and therefore we must join hands and combat Ebola together. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified Kenya as a "high-risk" country for the spread of the deadly Ebola virus. Kenya is vulnerable because is a major transport hub, with many flights from West Africa. Instead of isolating ourselves, let us emulate China and support our African brothers in distress.





Monday, September 15, 2014

Hong Kong on the path to electoral reforms through universal suffrage


The special administrative region of the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong; has made a substantial step towards democratic electoral reforms of how to select its leaders in 2017. Just two decades after returning to China, Hong Kong is on course to attain universal suffrage by 2017. The decision was adopted by China’s National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee. The decision of the standing committee of the NPC relates to issues of selecting the Chief Executive by universal suffrage and the method of forming the legislative council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) by 2016.

The democratic development of Hong Kong has been a major topic since the return and transfer of sovereignty to China in 1997. So far, universal suffrage in the selection of its chief executive has been the most important political issue. This is indeed a great step in electoral reforms vital for the development of the region’s political system in line with the one country, two systems principle. 

The One country, Two Systems Principle allows the Hong Kong government to administer all areas of government except foreign relations and military defence separately from the national Chinese government. Hong Kong’s basic law governs its political system, and stipulates that Hong Kong shall have a high degree of autonomy in all matters except the two. It also allows Hong Kong's independent judiciary to function under the common law framework. Nevertheless, the special administrative region of Hong Kong is required to cooperate with the central government. 

Representatives from the top legislature reiterated the view that minimizing the risk of political confrontation between the Special Administrative Region and the central government was essential. This was emphasized by the deputy secretary general of NPC Standing Committee, Mr. Li Fei when he said “To implement the policy of One country - Two systems, we won’t allow confrontations, neither within Hong Kong, nor between the SAR and the central government,". He added "There is a simple logic behind those who want different standards. It means we have to allow someone who wants to confront the central government to run in the elections. Otherwise, it’s not real universal suffrage; it doesn’t conform to international standards. Our attitude is very clear. 

At the heart of the political debate was whether a truly international standard exists when it comes to democratic elections, and whether they can be applied universally, especially in the context of Hong Kong. There was consensus and strong views that there is no such international standard.  According to Chu Kai, advisor of Fed. of Hong Kong watch Trades and Industries, “"There is no such international standard. Each country has its own special situation. We can never copy a so-called international standard and apply it to our own elections."

Therefore, the NPC’s standing committee’s decision was based on the Five-Step Process of Constitutional Development and it complied with the One Country Two Systems practice, the relevant provisions of the Basic Law of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, its legal status, the interests of different sectors of Hong Kong’s communities and the development of Hong Kong’s economy.

Experts believe the NPC Standing Committee’s decision has offered a clear direction and provided guidelines for achieving the goal of universal suffrage in 2017. Different sectors of Hong Kong society have also hailed the decision of the Committee. The experts said that one of the biggest changes under the new policy is the nomination process for Chief Executive Candidates.

The new policy stipulates that, depending on its feasibility, a committee will name no more than two to three candidates. This will allow the ballot to be more efficient and avoid having to hold multiple rounds in case several candidates each only get 10 or 20 percent of the vote. Also unlike before, candidates must be endorsed by half of the nomination committee, rather than just one-eighth. That’s because in the past, the Chief Executive was elected only by the twelve-hundred members of the committee. But in the future, universal suffrage will apply to over 6 million Hong Kong residents. The elected candidate must have the endorsement of over half the committee, which takes into consideration all the different political, religious and social groups’ standpoints. 

However, the decision is not the final step as the decision still needs to be implemented wholly and it requires a two- thirds majority support from all members of the Legislative Council. Mr. CY Leung, the Chief Executive Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), said "We should cherish the rights to historically elect our chief executive through ‘one person, one vote,' and express our opinions peacefully, rationally and legally. He urged all Hong Kong people, irrespective of their political affiliations, to come together with one heart, one vision, and take forward the democratic development of Hong Kong, and to implement universal suffrage."